Dominic Cummings allowed to keep away from backdated council tax on second dwelling

0
4


Council tax have to be paid on the second dwelling in Durham by which Dominic Cummings and his household stayed throughout the lockdown, a authorities company has dominated.

However the Valuation Workplace Company (VOA) determined to not backdate hundreds of kilos in unpaid council taxes on the property because it was constructed on his mother and father’ North Lodge property in 2002 with out permission.

The problem was referred to the VOA in June after Durham county council discovered there had been historic breaches of planning and constructing management regulation throughout the development of the property and the conversion of one other into two properties. On the time the council mentioned it couldn’t take enforcement motion in opposition to the household due to a time restrict on such measures.

The council has now confirmed that after the VOA’s ruling, the Cummings household will, from this month, should pay three separate council tax payments for the properties at North Lodge, as an alternative of the one invoice the household has been paying till now.

The 2 additional payments relate to a transformed dwelling occupied by Cummings’ sister, and the separate dwelling that Cummings occupied throughout lockdown.

Regardless of steering particularly banning using second properties throughout the lockdown, the Guardian and Each day Mirror revealed that Cummings and his household travelled to the Durham property on the peak of the lockdown. He made the 260-mile journey after his spouse grew to become sick with suspected coronavirus on 27 March, a day earlier than he additionally grew to become in poor health.

In his rose backyard assertion concerning the journey he described the property as “an remoted cottage on my father’s farm”, and didn’t point out that, as co-owner of the property, it was additionally his second dwelling. He insisted he had executed nothing mistaken and that the foundations allowed such preparations to take care of a toddler in distinctive circumstances.

The VAO refuses to touch upon particular person circumstances. However its resolution to not backdate council tax has infuriated some Durham councillors. Talking to the Northern Echo, John Shuttleworth, an unbiased councillor, mentioned: “If it was anyone else, they might be getting charged and it could be backdated, or they might be getting taken to courtroom.

“It simply proves there may be two units of guidelines: one for them and one other for everybody else. It isn’t proper.”

In a message to the Guardian, the Liberal Democrat councillor Liz Brown mentioned: “Phrases fail me. It seems as soon as once more there may be one regulation for the federal government’s cronies and one other for unusual folks. I’m pretty certain that you simply or I wouldn’t be given an amnesty over again council tax.

“Fairly aside from that, council tax is utilized in an amazing some ways to profit the entire county. By making this resolution, in a means DCC is penalising all of the residents of the county.”

John Hewitt, the council’s director of assets, mentioned: “The present single evaluation [for council tax on North Lodge] will probably be changed with three entries within the score record going ahead.

“These adjustments will probably be carried out with impact from 4 October 2020, which is the date we’ve been instructed to use the adjustments from. The day which the score record is to be amended is a matter for the Valuation Workplace Company.”

In a press release the VOA mentioned: “We deal with all taxpayers equally and we worth home properties consistent with laws.”



Supply hyperlink

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.